Mac Visser vs Julius Bult Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Visser vs J. Bult

Mac Visser

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

C. Rank

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Julius Bult

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

C. Rank

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Visser 1 - 0 Bult

They have played 2 sets in total, with Mac Visser winning 2 and Julius Bult winning 0. The last match between Mac Visser and Julius Bult was at the M15 Haren, 01-09-2025, Round: Q2, Surface: Clay, with Mac Visser getting the victory 6-3 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Visser	1
Bult	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q2) M15 Haren(09-01-25)

Stats

Mac Visser

Julius Bult

M. Visser vs J. Bult H2H Profile

M. Visser	Stats	J. Bult
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
56.82% (25-19)	Career Total W/L	29.73% (11-26)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Visser vs J. Bult Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mac Visser has won 41.58% of points on their second serve, while Julius Bult has won 34.62%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mac Visser, in recent form, has won 44.57% of their opponent's second serve points, while Julius Bult has won 41.18%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.02% and 23.40% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mac Visser has saved 53.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Julius Bult has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mac Visser has won 58.97% of matches played (W/L 23/16), with Julius Bult winning 42.86% (W/L 3/4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mac Visser has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 18/14), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 5/4). Julius Bult has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 5/8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 6/18).
Player level: In the last year, Mac Visser has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.97% of matches (W/L 23/16), where as Julius Bult has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 3/4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mac Visser winning 1 times and Julius Bult being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mac Visser winning 2 and Julius Bult winning 0.
The last match between Mac Visser and Julius Bult was at the M15 Haren, 01-09-2025, Round: Q2, Surface: Clay, with Mac Visser getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mac Visser has played against opponents with an average rank of 241.31 while Julius Bult has played against players with an average rank of 108.57.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mac Visser has won 77% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Julius Bult has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mac Visser has converted 33.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Julius Bult has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mac Visser vs Julius Bult Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Visser vs J. Bult H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Visser	Stats	J. Bult
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Visser Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M15 Heraklion - 10-11-2025
R2 Uladzimir IgnatikU. Ignatik	L	6-1 7-6(5)	Stats
R1 Reece FalckR. Falck	W	6-2 3-6 6-3	Stats
Q3 David SchwarcD. Schwarc	W	6-4 2-6 10-7	Stats
Q2 Thomas EdwardsT. Edwards	W	7-5 1-6 10-7	Stats
M15 Heraklion - 03-11-2025
Q3 Matthias UjvaryM. Ujvary	L	7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

J. Bult Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M15 Haren - 01-09-2025
Q2 Mac VisserM. Visser	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Q1 Eise HoogeveenE. Hoogeveen	W	6-2 3-6 10-7	Stats
M25 Oldenzaal - 25-08-2025
Q1 Stijn PelS. Pel	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
M25 The Hague - 07-07-2025
Q1 Stian KlaassenS. Klaassen	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
M15 Alkmaar - 23-06-2025
R1 William GrantW. Grant	L	7-6(2) 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Visser vs J. Bult Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Visser	Stats	J. Bult
56.82% (25/19)	YTD Win/Loss	29.73% (11/26)
52.88% (55/49)	Sets Win/Loss	30.86% (25/56)
51.61% (544/510)	Games Win/Loss	43.61% (338/437)
55.56% (5/4)	Hard Win/Loss	38.46% (5/8)
56.25% (18/14)	Clay Win/Loss	25.00% (6/18)
66.67% (2/1)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
0.08	Aces Per Game	0.01
41	Aces Total	5
0.11	Double Faults Per Game	0.06
59	Total Double Faults	22
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
213.89	Average Opponent Rank	153.54
62% (1028/1662)	1st Serve %	65% (142/219)
60% (616/1028)	1st Serve Win %	65% (93/142)
48% (304/634)	2nd Serve Win %	36% (28/77)
45% (92/203)	Break Points Won % (Total)	57% (4/7)
45% (727/1616)	Return Points Win %	30% (57/190)
56.82% (25/19)	Futures W/L	29.73% (11/26)
57% (25/44)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	30% (11/37)
30% (3/10)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	22% (2/9)
69% (11/16)	Deciding Set Win %	57% (4/7)
91% (23/21)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (11/9)
9% (23/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (11/2)
19% (21/4)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	8% (26/2)